As a result of high international oil
and natural gas prices, the purchasing
power of Russia, a leading exporter
of these products, gradually gets better.
Moreover, the rise in Turkey's importation
from the Russian Federation particularly
stems from the rise in worldwide energy
prices. On the other hand, once an additional
natural gas is supplied by Russia within
the framework of the Blue Stream agreement
by this year, the aforementioned gap,
doubtlessly, will rapidly widen in the
following years. Actually, the amount
Turkey will pay in 2005 for only the
natural gas importation from Russia
is expected to be 3 billion dollars.
Furthermore, quota and customs tariffs
against Turkish exporters are expected
to be amended along with the acceleration
of Russian Federation's membership to
WTO. Moreover, parallel to the recent
rise in the expendable income of Russian
people, demand for more quality import
products increases. This also creates
opportunities for Turkish firms offering
high quality goods and services.
Besides foreign trade under normal
circumstances, luggage trade has also
fulfilled major functions in shaping
the trade relations between two countries.
However, despite a distinct type of
business "urged by necessity"
due to lack of production and excess
demand in Russia in early 1990s, luggage
trade is inclined to regress by 1995.
Main reasons to cause regression in
luggage trade are as follows:
- Particularly after the financial
crisis in 1998, Russian buyers preferred
alternative markets like China, Poland
and Greece instead of Turkey and this
created a competitive environment
for the relatively low price goods
of these countries.
- The Russian Government applied restrictions
to unregistered economy and luggage
trade in compliance with negotiations
with IMF, WTO and other international
organizations.
- Local manufacturer in Russia grew
stronger and campaigns against luggage
trade were hastened after powerful
Western companies entered the market
(Local manufacturers who especially
made progress in the fields of domestic
leather, textile products, ready-made
clothing and construction materials
applied intense lobbying on the government).
- Many items of luggage trade started
to be manufactured within the country
in accordance with import substitution
policies being implemented by the
Russian Government.
Doubts rose against the quality of
products within luggage trade.
- Demands relatively lessened due
to stores a number of Turkish enterprises
opened in Moscow.
- Fluctuations in the exchange rate.
Therefore, the Russian Federation aims
to modify the course of business by
passengers, which is also called as
luggage trade step-by-step by a series
of local precautions. However, it is
observed that the modification seems
unlikely to occur by now and the course
of business by passengers will endure
for a few years. On the other hand,
due to WTO membership negotiations,
it is highly expected that Russia will
terminate luggage trade after a transition
period.
Luggage trade, as a practice of the
transition period, served as a very
important instrument for the trade relations
between two countries particularly at
early times. But it is quite unlikely
to long-run maintain these trade relations
in this wise. Therefore, legal arrangements
and incentives are required to direct
sectors dealing with luggage trade in
Turkey to official business.
3.2. Contracting Services
As mentioned above, embarking of Turkish
construction firms on the Russian market
falls in with the last years of the
Soviet Union. The Natural Gas Contract
put into effect by 1987 between Turkey
and the Russian Federation has been
an essential driving force for trade
relations as well as for Turkish construction
firms to enter the Russian market. In
this regard, Turkish construction firms
have been undertaking, to an increasing
degree, major projects in the Russian
market since 1987.
This process gained impetus within
1990s. It reached the climax for military
housing projects financed by German
credits particularly in between 1993
and 1995. The housing projects financed
by Germany for Russian military personnel
returning from East Germany in 1991
were a turning point for Turkish contractors.
In this respect, total amount of the
project undertaken by Turkish contractors
was almost 2.5 billion DM.
The Russian crisis in August 1998 greatly
affected both economic and trade relations
and the construction activities of Turkish
firms in Russia. Financial resources
of units such as municipalities, banks
and large-scale companies which supply
financing became restricted after devaluation,
and hence construction expenses needed
to be confined. Banks and large companies
also wholly froze their earlier construction
activities since they chose the process
of reducing.
In the post-crisis period, decline
in the real income of Russian people
caused the sale of houses to fall; the
need for an office has faded because
foreign companies left the country and
regular business life came to a stand.
This was due to a number of factors
such as the economic crisis, the state
caused by elections, disputes between
the Central Government and local governments
and difficulty to supply financing.
The annual total of Turkish firms' construction
activities in Russia descended to 100
million dollars.
145 Turkish contracting firms undertook
712 projects equal to an approximate
12.8 billion dollars in the Russian
Federation so far. (4) The Russian Federation
is the country which Turkish contracting
firms attempted projects at most. Considering
the total project amount, almost one
fourth of projects undertaken by Turkish
contracting firms abroad involve the
Russian Federation. Depending on the
number of projects, this proportion
reaches an estimate 35%.
Today, restrictions on financial resources
of the Russian Government and local
governments, support of project-financing
large-scale Russian establishments towards
Russian construction firms and an increasing
tendency to employ Russian workers create
difficulties for Turkish companies to
attempt new tasks. The Government of
Russian Federation utilizes its financing
resources to support Russian contracting
firms, which grow stronger and obtain
technical skills. On the other hand,
Western companies with their own financing
in this sector enjoy more advantages
in the Russian Federation.
As a result, Turkish construction companies
need to provide their own financing
resources in order to be permanent in
the Russian market. In this regard,
building partnership with municipalities
and some Russian firms can militate
in favor of Turkish firms to compete
with Western companies.
Although contracting services undertaken
by Turkish contracting firms in Russian
Federation descended in terms of number
and project amounts after the crisis
in August 1998, a certain increase is
expected in the forthcoming period depending
on the evident revival in Russian economy
particularly as a result of the rise
in worldwide energy prices. In addition,
the Russian Government made a resolution
to begin inviting tenders for public
services again by 2000. This situation
is believed to give Turkish firms new
opportunities.
On the other hand, Turkish contracting
services in Russian Federation have
a big share in bilateral economic relations
while the volume of Russian contracting
services in Turkey is very limited.
Therefore, Russia consistently demands
that the imbalance is eliminated and
Russian contractors are granted more
shares in the Turkish contracting market.
Russian contracting firms which cannot
perform effectively at projects of infrastructure
in Turkey due to lack of technology
and financing try to be assigned to
tasks such as subway construction, railroad
construction and electrification, thermal
and hydro-electric power plants, construction
of natural gas pipelines and gas storage
facilities, construction and soil investigation
of earthquake resistant housing, and
fossil fuel and coal exploration. On
the other hand, the modernization of
a number of industrial facilities established
under support by Soviet Union in Turkey
is among other demands of Russian contracting
firms.
Tehnopromeksport, Tehnostroyeksport
and Energomaşeksport are the main Russian
construction firms acting in Turkey.
The aggregate amount of Russian contracting
firms' contracts in Turkey is almost
360 million dollars. The major ones
are as follows:
|
PRIMARY PROJECTS
RUSSIAN CONTRACTING FIRMS IN TURKEY
ACCOMPLISHED
|
| Project Title |
Project Rate
(Million $) |
| Electrification of
Çerkezköy - Kapıkule Railway |
14 |
| Three Bridge Constructions
on the Ankara Beltway |
60 |
| Construction of Deriner
Dam and Hydro-electric Power Plant |
40 |
| Modernization of İskenderun
Met. and Seydişehir Alum Facilities |
3 |
| İmralı - Kayseri Natural
Gas Pipeline Construction |
40 |
| Samsun - Ankara Natural
Gas Pipeline Construction |
150 |
| Engineering Services
for Gas Storage Facility Constructions |
4.5 |
| Aqueduct Construction
Under İstanbul Melen Project |
50 |
3.3. Investments
Import substitution policies initiated
after the devaluation caused by the
crisis in 1988 in Russia and the following
rise in tariff walls complicated exportation
to the Russian Federation, and subsequently,
investing and establishing one's own
distribution network in Russia gradually
gained more importance than selling
goods to Russian Federation from abroad.
The most important progress recently
occupying a position of prominence in
terms of direct investments in the Russian
Federation involves a rise in direct
investments not in central but local
areas. Lately, foreign investors' interest
has moved from large cities of Russia,
Moscow above all, to local areas. All
charges, mainly wages, raw material
prices and rents, are very dissimilar
between Moscow and the country. Reasons
to raise interest in the country include
the fact that bureaucracy and tax administrations
and other auditing agencies apply heavy
restrictions on foreign companies performing
in large cities. Another reason is that
enterprising and liberal governors of
a few local areas provide a better business
environment, enact private laws concerning
incentives and warranty and follow several
policies pertaining to foreign capital
protection.
In line with this development, a rise
is recently seen in Turkish investments
in the Russian Federation. By early
2003, Turkish investments in Russia
have exceeded 1 billion dollars. Turkish
investments in the Russian Federation
mostly involve sectors like business
and shopping centers, food and drink,
textile products, banking and telecommunication.
Major investments done by Turkish firms
in the Russian Federation are as follows:
| FIRM / ESTABLISHMENT |
INVESTMENT
AREA |
INVESTMENT AMOUNT
(million $)
|
| ENKA Holding |
Business
Centers |
600 |
| RamEnka (Koç Holding-Enka
Holding) |
Retail
Trade |
250 |
| Anadolu Endüstri Holding
(Efes) |
Bear
Production |
125 |
| Finansbank, Garantibank,
Denizbank, Yapı Kredi Bankası, Ziraat
Bankası |
Banking |
87 |
| Netaş (Rontelekom) |
Telecommunication |
44.7 |
| TOBB - TİM* |
Trade
Center |
40 |
| Zorlu Holding (Vestel)* |
Television
Production |
40 |
| Türkiye Şişe ve Cam
Fabrikaları (Ruscam) |
Bottle
and Glass Production |
12 |
| BinMeksan |
Gas Pump Production |
5.5 |
Source : Cihangir Gürkan Şen, Turkish
- Russian Federation Economic and Trade
Relations Report, Confederation of Russian-
Turkish Businessmen Publications, No.
8, May 2003.
(*) Investments to be fulfilled
within 2003.
3.2.1. ENKA Construction Investments
ENKA, a business which possesses the
greatest trade volume among other Turkish
construction firms practicing in the
Russian Federation, is at the same time
the first foreign company to invest
in immovables in Russia. ENKA Holding
constructed buildings on lands it hired
for 49 years from the Municipality of
Moscow and now markets them as offices,
stores and houses. The number of A-class
business buildings owned by ENKA and
other companies to which ENKA is a shareholder
is 18 and the aggregate construction
area reaches 275,000 sq. m. This figure
equals to 25% of the whole Moscow A-class
office market and carried ENKA to a
leading position in the market. The
approximate market value of these investments
is about 600 million dollars.
3.2.2. Ramstore Chain Stores
RamEnka which is a co-investment by
Koç and ENKA Groups practicing in this
country since 1997 is the greatest chain
store in the Russian Federation today,
called Ramstore. Koç and ENKA Groups'
investments in Russia approached 250
million dollars with respect to RamEnka,
a 100% Turkish investment. The first
of Ramstore chain stores was actualized
by Turkish Eximbank credit. Along with
the rise in their income, Russian people
moved from open markets to supermarkets,
which in turn enables RamEnka to raise
its investments in Russia for the following
5 years up to 1 billion dollars by opening
new stores and shopping malls in Moscow
and other regions.
More than half of Ramstores' turnover
includes Russian goods and about 5%
Turkish goods; the remaining 40% involves
European goods. In addition, Ramstore
labeled 75 products are also offered
for sale.
3.2.3. Anadolu Endüstri Holding
Investments
Anadolu Group is the Turkish firm that
invests most in the manufacture sector
in Russia. The aggregate amount of investments
in Russia including beer factories in
Moscow and Rostov and malt facilities
in Moscow equals to an estimate 125
million dollars.
The Moscow Efes Brewery in Moscow is
one of the biggest beer factories in
Russia in terms of capacity. Starıy
Melnik labeled beers produced by Anadolu
Group are among the most favorite beers
in Russia. Today, according to data
received from United Financial Group
(UFG), the share of Efes in the Russian
beer market is about 3.5% and Efes is
the 7th biggest producer of Russia.
Besides Efes and Starıy Melnik, the
German beer Wasteiner with the largest
sales volume has also been manufactured
in factories of Anadolu-Efes in Moscow.
3.2.4. TOBB-TİM Turkish Trade Center
The project to build a trade center
in Moscow where Turkish export goods
will be exhibited and marketed is accomplished
by the Union of Chambers of Commerce,
Industry, Maritime Trade and Commodity
Exchanges of Turkey (TOBB) and Turkish
Assembly of Exporters (TİM). The construction
of the center, which will cost 55 million
dollars, will be finished in December
2003.
3.2.5. Şişecam Gorohovets Factory
The Glass Container Factory established
by Anadolu Glass Industry INC., a Şişecam
corporation, in the state of Vladimir,
Gorohovets town, 330 km northeast to
Moscow aims to meet Russian Federation's
quality glass container needs in alcoholic
and non-alcoholic beverage and food
sectors. The first oven of the factory
with 43 thousand sq. m. enclosed area
on 17 ha of land was constructed by
an investment of 26 million dollars
and initiated on September 6, 2002.
The second oven, the foundation of which
was laid the same day and which will
double the capacity of the former, is
also complete and set to operate on
May 13, 2003. Together with 22 million
dollars spent for the second oven, the
total sum of investment has reached
48 million dollars. 50% of the investment
made use of equities whereas another
50% includes credits. The credit financing
was available through IFC. Including
the third oven planned to operate in
2004, the total investment will amount
to 75 million dollars. The aim is to
be the No 1 glass container manufacturer
in Russian Federation within 3 years.
3.2.6. Vestel Television Factory
Vestel, practicing within Zorlu Holding,
has decided to co-invest with Standard,
a corporate Russian television manufacturer,
to produce televisions in Russia in
2002. Vestel and its Russian partner's
factory in Alesandrov, state of Vladimir
with an approximate 40 million dollars
investment is planned to operate in
August this year.
Besides large-scale investments, there
are also medium or small size Turkish
investments the amount of investment
of which differs from 1 to 5 million
dollars in sectors such as machinery,
textile, ready-made clothing and food.
These include Binmeksan gas pumps factory,
"Colin's Jeans" Combed Texture
Factory, "Muya" Sandals Factory,
"M" Döner House, "Etalon
aluminum facade".
Russian companies' investments in Turkey
are very limited when compare to the
volume and diversity of Turkish investments
in Russian Federation. By the end of
2002, direct Russian investments in
Turkey have been below 100 million dollars.
Russian companies are mostly in the
business of transportation, trade and
tourism. Moreover, they are eager to
be more effective in case petroleum
processing, petrochemistry and gas distribution
enterprises in Turkey are privatized.
Indeed, Russian companies like Gazprom,
Lukoil and Tatneft are very engaged
in the privatization of Tüpraş.
3.4. Tourism
Tourism is today the largest economic
sector that made a remarkable development
with regard to Turkish-Russian relations.
Since early 1990s, Turkey has been one
of the most favorite countries of Russian
tourists. This is partly due to Turkish
tourism agencies practicing in Moscow.
Today, Turkish tourism dealers hold
one fourth of the Russian tourism market.
Turkey's tourism income from Russian
Federation is about 700 million dollars.
Attracting nearly 300 thousand Russian
tourists, Spain stands second after
Turkey. Number of tourists coming from
the Russian Federation to Turkey is
shown by years on the table below.
| NUMBER
OF RUSSIAN TOURISTS |
| Years |
No of Russian
Tourists
(persons) |
Share Within
the Total (%) |
Annual Rise Rate
(%)
|
| 1999 |
438.719 |
5,86 |
- |
| 2000 |
676.958 |
6,49 |
54,30 |
| 2001 |
757.446 |
6,52 |
11,89 |
| 2002 |
945.000 |
7,14 |
24.85 |
Source: Turkish Republic, Ministry
of Tourism
Due to the negative impact on the purchasing
power of Russian people created by the
financial crisis in Russia in August
1998 and the following devaluation,
the number of Russian tourists coming
to Turkey decreased. However, as effects
of the crisis have lately been cleared
away and purchasing power and consumption
demands of people particularly from
Russian middle class have increased,
the number of tourists from Russia again
trend to ascend. Moreover, the relative
fall in vacation costs in Turkey after
the devaluation that occurred in 2001
made Turkey a more appealing country
of holidays for the Russian tourists.
|
THE PLACE
OF RUSSIAN TOURISTS IN THE RANKING
OF TOP COUNTRIES
|
|
2001
|
2002
|
|
Country
|
No of Tourists
|
% Share |
No of Tourists |
% Share |
| Germany |
2.884.051
|
24.82
|
3.480.051
|
26,28
|
| UK |
845.536
|
7.28
|
1 040 228
|
7,85
|
| Russian Federation |
757.446
|
6.52
|
945 678
|
7,14
|
| Hollanda |
632.975
|
5.45
|
871 560
|
6,58
|
| Bulgaria |
540.452
|
4,65
|
833 848
|
6,29
|
Source: Turkish Republic, Ministry
of Tourism
As a result, the Russian Federation
was the third country to send the most
tourists to Turkey in 2002 after Germany
and UK. On the other hand, according
to data received from Banko Information
Agency, Turkey was the first out of
hundred among summer vacation preferences
of Russian citizens in 2002. Turkey
stood the first with its 49.1% market
share in all year 2002 while Egypt came
after with a percentage of 49.0%. Third
in the ranking, Thailand's share was
about 40%.
According to World Tourism Organization,
the number of Turkish citizens to enter
Russia is about 100 thousand. It is
declared that the number of Turkish
citizens to visit Moscow in 2001 was
almost 40 thousand. The year in which
the most Turkish citizens entered Russia
is 1996 with an approximate 160 thousand.
While Russian tourists particularly
in the first half of 1990s visited Turkey
mainly for the purpose of shopping,
they have been coming to vacation to
an increasing degree since then. Why
Russian tourists prefer Turkey to vacation
includes low costs, geographical proximity,
quality service and easy visa acquisition.
On the other hand, a number of studies
have shown that the rise in the income
level of Russian people moved primarily
to tourism and especially consumer goods
and services. As a matter of fact, Russian
tourists pass their vacation in Turkey's
quality facilities at a lower cost compared
to those in Europe. Easy visa acquisition
is also another important factor, which
encourages Russian tourists to choose
Turkey.
2 to 3-day tours of shopping abroad
have recently become widespread particularly
among high-level income groups in Russia.
This is primarily due to high costs
of quality and fancy import goods in
Russia. Therefore, Istanbul and Milan
are the leading shopping centers, which
Russians favor most. Russian tourists
who visit Istanbul via shopping tours
buy many European products, most of
which are produced in Turkey, cheaper
than their prices in Russia.
Moreover, Turkey has lately been a
favorite country of winter tourism for
Russian tourists to an increasing degree.
This is likely due to transfer-flights
from Istanbul to Uludağ and through
flights to Erzurum Palandöken.
Low cost is the main reason why Russian
tourists prefer Turkey, which is highly
influenced by the extreme competition
among Turkish tourism agencies practicing
in Moscow. In a sector where extreme
competition is faced, it is inevitable
that a Turkish tourism agency's price
dumping affects another Turkish agency
which wants to carry more Russian tourists
to Turkey. On the other hand, the economically
aware Russian consumers first do some
market research and naturally try do
benefit from this competition between
tourism agencies.
Almost 90% of Russian tourists enter
Turkey in either Antalya or Istanbul.
This describes that Russian tourists
visit Turkey for maritime tourism and
business purposes (luggage trade).
4. Conclusion
Although Turkey and Russia are two
great economic powers in the Eurasian
region and progress is made in mutual
economic relations, the level which
economic relations reached is far behind
the accessible potential. The situation
is rather apparent if foreign trade
volumes of both countries are placed
one upon the other. The trade volume
between two countries is far from reaching
5% of all their worldwide trade volume
which is totally 250 billion dollars.
Another aspect to take into consideration
is that both countries have economic
structures that complement each other.
Today Russia can supply a large number
of raw and semi-finished inputs primarily
energy products and minerals which the
Turkish economy is in need at lower
shipping costs. Moreover, the production
of many consumer goods from food to
textile which the Russian community
demands is carried out in Turkey at
worldwide competitive prices and quality.
Minimum balance is required in order
to attain a sound and steady progress
in trade and economic relations of two
countries. The most important difficulty
in this respect is experienced in the
field of business. Therefore, the adoption
of a rational percentage to recompense
the natural gas amount by Turkish offsets
as implemented under the Contract dated
1984 is highly important with regard
to the course of mutual trade balance.
Similarly, such mechanisms may also
be applicable for counterbalancing oil,
coal and other materials that occupy
a significant place in importations
from Russia. Furthermore, it is highly
beneficial to create mechanisms to encourage
Russian firms' activities in Turkey.
Developing projects that cover several
third countries located between Turkey
and Russia can contribute mutually to
eliminate perceptions based on regional
competition and power struggles particularly
observed in both nations and governments.
Mutual common interests to be created
in the economic field can help sound
improvement of political relations.
As recently been discussed in terms
of Blue Stream project, relations must
be evaluated comprehensively; problems
that arise occasionally shall not be
allowed to affect the general outline
of relations.
Turkey's main policy is certainly to
integrate into the European Union. Sound
relations to be developed between Russia
and Turkey will serve as a component
rather than an alternative for the European
Union process. Strong relations that
Turkey will develop with many neighboring
countries, primarily Russia, can support
Turkey's economic and political state
against the Western world.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. The Event of Kavalalı Mehmet
Ali Pasha the Egyptian Governor.
2. State Statistics Institute, Eighth
Five-Year Development Plan, Transport
(Pipeline Transportation) Private Specialization
Commission Report, Ankara, 2001.
3. Russian Federation Report,
Export Development Research Center (İGEME),
Ankara, December 2000.
4. Data from Undersecretary of Foreign
Trade, General Directorate of Contracts,
Foreign Contracting Services Bureau.
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1
|
NATURAL
GAS PROCUREMENT CONTRACTS SIGNED
BY TURKEY SO FAR
|
|
Current
Contracts
|
Amount
(Plateau)(billion m³ / year)
|
Date
of Subscription
|
Period
(Year)
|
Position
|
| Russia
(West) |
6
|
14
February 1986 |
25
|
In
force |
| Algeria
(LNG) |
4 |
14
April 1988 |
20 |
In
force |
| Nigeria
(LNG) |
1.2 |
9
November 1995 |
22 |
In
force |
| Iran |
10 |
8
August 1996 |
25 |
In
force |
| Russia
(Blue Stream) |
16 |
15
December 1997 |
25 |
In
force |
| Russia
(West) |
8 |
18
February 1998 |
23 |
In
force |
| Turkmenistan |
16 |
21
May 1999 |
30 |
2005 |
Azerbaijan
|
6.6 |
12
March 2001 |
15 |
2005 |
APPENDIX 2
TABLE OF NATURAL GAS PROCUREMENT IN
ACCORDANCE WITH CONTRACTS SIGNED BY
TURKEY (% Distribution by Countries)

Source : BOTAŞ
APPENDIX 3
|
NATURAL GAS
PROCUREMENT BY YEARS AND COUNTRIES
|
|
YEARS
|
RUSSIA
|
IRAN
|
TPAO
|
ALGERIA
|
NIGERIA
|
SPOT LNG
|
TOTAL
(Million cm3)
|
|
1987
|
432
|
-
|
85
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
517
|
|
1988
|
1.136
|
-
|
42
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1.178
|
|
1989
|
2.986
|
-
|
114
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3.100
|
|
1990
|
3.246
|
-
|
109
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
3.355
|
|
1991
|
4.031
|
-
|
65
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
4.096
|
|
1992
|
4.430
|
-
|
31
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
4.461
|
|
1993
|
4.952
|
-
|
23
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
4.975
|
|
1994
|
4.957
|
-
|
2
|
418
|
-
|
-
|
5.377
|
|
1995
|
5.560
|
-
|
-
|
1.058
|
-
|
240
|
6.858
|
|
1996
|
5.524
|
-
|
-
|
2.436
|
-
|
80
|
8.040
|
|
1997
|
6.574
|
-
|
-
|
3.300
|
-
|
-
|
9.874
|
|
1998
|
6.539
|
-
|
150
|
3.051
|
-
|
644
|
10.384
|
|
1999
|
8.693
|
-
|
299
|
3.589
|
77
|
-
|
12.658
|
|
2000
|
10.079
|
-
|
154
|
3.962
|
780
|
-
|
14.975
|
|
2001
|
10.931
|
115
|
-
|
3.985
|
1.337
|
-
|
16.368
|
|
2002
|
11.603
|
670
|
-
|
4.078
|
1.271
|
-
|
17.622
|
Source : BOTAŞ
APPENDIX 4
RUSSIA'S SHARE IN THE NATURAL GAS IMPORTATION
IN 2002 (% Distribution)
Source : BOTAŞ
APPENDIX 5
|
RUSSIAN FEDERATION'S
SHARE IN TURKEY'S EXPORTATION
|
| YEARS |
RUSSIA'S SHARE
(%) |
RUSSIA'S RANK
|
|
1998
|
4.9
|
5
|
|
1999
|
2.2
|
9
|
|
2000
|
2.3
|
9
|
|
2001
|
3.0
|
7
|
|
2002
|
3.3
|
6
|
| |
|
RUSSIAN FEDERATION'S
SHARE IN TURKEY'S IMPORTATION
|
| YEARS |
RUSSIA'S SHARE
(%) |
RUSSIA'S RANK
|
|
1998
|
4.6
|
6
|
|
1999
|
5.8
|
5
|
|
2000
|
7.1
|
4
|
|
2001
|
8.3
|
3
|
|
2002
|
7.6
|
6
|
Source : DİE
APPENDIX 6
|
LUGGAGE TRADE
INCOME RATE OF TURKEY AND WORLDWIDE
IMPORTATION THROUGH LUGGAGE TRADE
OF RUSSIAN FEDERATION BY YEARS(Billion
$)
|
|
Years
|
Luggage Trade
Income Rate of Turkey
|
Exchange
(%)
|
Worldwide
Importation Through Luggage Trade
of Russia
|
Exchange
(%)
|
|
1997
|
5.8
|
-37.5
|
18.3
|
13.7
|
|
1998
|
3.6
|
-36.2
|
13.3
|
-27.3
|
|
1999
|
2.2
|
-41.0
|
8.5
|
-36.0
|
|
2000
|
2.9
|
30.0
|
11.1
|
30.5
|
|
2001
|
3.0
|
3.2
|
12.1
|
9.0
|
Source : Turkish Central Bank
Russian State Statistics Committee
APPENDIX 7
|
HOLIDAY REGIONS
FAVORED MOST IN RUSSIA IN 2002
|
|
RANK
|
COUNTRY /
TOWN
|
|
1
|
Turkey
|
|
2
|
St. Petersburg
|
|
3
|
Crimea
|
|
4
|
Sochi
|
|
5
|
Spain
|
|
6
|
Annaba
|
|
7
|
Bulgaria
|
|
8
|
Greek Administration
of Cyprus
|
Source : Nezavisimaya Gazeta
APPENDIX 8
|
TURKEY'S
SHARE IN RUSSIAN TOURISTS' VACATION
IN 2002 BY SEASONS
|
|
Season
|
Share Per
Cent
|
| Winter |
3.7 |
| April |
43 |
| May |
41 |
| June |
54 |
| July |
48 |
| August |
47 |
| September |
42 |
| October |
25 |